Reasons for Caution when Evaluating Health Care Interventions Using Non-Randomised Study Designs

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1661-4127|11|1|40-45

ISSN： 1661-4119

Source： Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine, Vol.11, Iss.1, 2004-11, pp. : 40-45

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A Framework for Classifying Study Designs to Evaluate Health Care Interventions

By  

Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2004-11 ,pp. : 13-17

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Non-Randomised Pilot Study to Compare Complementary and Conventional Treatments of Acute Sinusitis

By  

Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2004-11 ,pp. : 99-104

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies

By  

Forschende Komplementärmedizin / Research in Complementary Medicine, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2004-11 ,pp. : 46-52

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Using quality improvement methods for evaluating health care

By Siriwardena A Niroshan  

Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2009-06 ,pp. : 155-159

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cognitive Behaviour Group Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Non-Randomised Waiting List Controlled Study

By  

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vol. 74, Iss. 4, 2005-06 ,pp. : 218-224

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite