Plasma Homocysteine Measurement with Ion Exchange Chromatography (Jeol Aminotac 500): A Comparison with the Abbott IMx Assay

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1423-0151|15|2|149-152

ISSN： 1011-7571

Source： Medical Principles and Practice, Vol.15, Iss.2, 2006-02, pp. : 149-152

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated ion exchange chromatography (IEC) on the Jeol Aminotac 500 analyzer for total homocysteine (tHcy) determination and compared it with an immunoassay method using fluorescence polarization on an Abbott IMx analyzer. Methods: IEC method validation (linearity, limit of detection, precision, interference) was made according to the French Biology Society guidelines (Société Française de Biologie Clinique). Moreover, during a 2-month period, 55 plasma samples from patients scheduled for routine tHCy measurement were assayed by both methods for determining correlation. Results: The IEC method was found linear up to at least 190 µmol/l, and the limit of detection was 1.6 µmol/l. Precision was studied with 3 controls at 6, 15 and 30 µmol/l. Intra-assay coefficients of variation (n = 14) were 8.3, 3.1 and 2.3%, respectively, and inter-assay coefficients of variation (n = 15) were 9.6, 5.1 and 4.9%, respectively. No interference was found with other sulfur-containing amino acids (methionine, cysteine). An excellent agreement was found between IEC and fluorescence polarization (Deming regression; y = 0.99x – 1.23; r = 0.97; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The IEC method for tHcy measurement shows adequate precision and correlates highly with the IMx assay. The IEC method is more time-consuming but less expensive in reagent cost and allows simultaneous determination of plasma methionine concentration which may help to explain the underlying mechanism responsible for hyperhomocysteinemia.