Author: Matras Yaron
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
E-ISSN: 1569-9978|21|3|613-653
ISSN: 0378-4177
Source: Studies in Language, Vol.21, Iss.3, 1997-01, pp. : 613-653
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
A distinction is commonly made between morphological or surface ergativity, and syntactic or deep ergativity, based on what Dixon has termed the "pivot" behavior (S/A vs. S/O) of a language. Since marked constructions enable an S/A pivot to function even in some deep ergative languages, deep or syntactic ergativity might be interpreted as gradational, depending on the degree to which ergative morphology interferes with the grammar of clause integration and referent coherence. For spoken Kurmanji, a northwest Iranian language with surface ergativity, tentative restrictions on zero-anaphora in conjoined clauses are identified which relate to ergative agreement patterns. These are compared to the distribution of zero-anaphora in other complex constructions involving clause combining. Surface ergativity is found to be one of a variety of factors which may promote re-location of the subject referent in a language in which non-finite structures play a peripheral role, and multi-clause constructions are under pressure to replicate the structure of single proposition clauses.
Related content
Clause combining across grammars
By Nir Bracha
Constructions and Frames, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2014-01 ,pp. :
By Nir Bracha
Constructions and Frames, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 2015-01 ,pp. :