Stratification for Confounding – Part 2: Direct and Indirect Standardization

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1660-2110|116|4|c322-c325

ISSN： 1660-2110

Source： Nephron Clin Pract, Vol.116, Iss.4, 2010-07, pp. : c322-c325

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Stratification for Confounding – Part 1: The Mantel-Haenszel Formula

By  

Nephron Clin Pract, Vol. 116, Iss. 4, 2010-07 ,pp. : c317-c321

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Indirect Versus Direct Standardization Methods for Reporting Healthcare-Associated Infections: An Analysis of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Maryland

By  

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 38, Iss. 8, 2017-06 ,pp. : 989-992

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Confounding

By  

Nephron Clin Pract, Vol. 116, Iss. 2, 2010-06 ,pp. : c143-c147

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

FES for Bladder: Direct or Indirect Means?

By  

PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 1987-01 ,pp. : 240-245

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Self-monitoring of glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Bayesian meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons

By Jansen Jeroen P.  

Current Medical Research and Opinion, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2006-04 ,pp. : 671-681

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite