

Author: Jayachandiran Chenthuran Harrison Kathryn E. Afifi Tamara D. Davis Sharde M.
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
E-ISSN: 1569-9935|26|1|39-63
ISSN: 1387-6740
Source: Narrative Inquiry, Vol.26, Iss.1, 2016-01, pp. : 39-63
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
During the Great Recession, discourses of what constituted prosperity flooded the global landscape. The concept of prosperity became a prominent master narrative that dictated the ways families operated and made decisions. The goal of this study was to examine how 82 married couples experiencing economic uncertainty in California (re)negotiated their family narratives of wealth and prosperity in the wake of the Great Recession. The findings revealed that few, if any, couples were able to communicatively re-define prosperity in a way that wholly resisted or rejected the master narrative of material wealth. The narratives demonstrated how this master narrative held many of these families captive by restricting their ability to reconstitute their understanding of prosperity in productive ways even when the taken-for-granted meaning of prosperity-as-wealth was challenged during the Great Recession. The families who successfully re-defined prosperity depended on other dominant discourses such as health, faith, family quality and relationships to refuse or repudiate the master narrative of wealth as prosperity. The findings support Lindemann-Nelson’s (2001) argument that successfully overcoming a master narrative often requires a patchwork of resistance strategies that permeate daily discourse, before they begin to chip away at the larger dominant discourse.
Related content






Claiming Visibility: Women in Public/Public Women in the United States, 1865-1910
DQR Studies in Literature, Vol. 45, Iss. 1, 2010-04 ,pp. :

