

Publisher: Policy Press
ISSN: 0305-5736
Source: Policy and Politics, Vol.34, Iss.1, 2006-01, pp. : 5-26
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
How does regeneration affect health and how have successive urban policy evaluations sought to measure such impacts? This article draws on a systematic review of national-level evaluation documentation relating to government-funded, area-based regeneration initiatives in the UK since 1980. The review examined whether health impacts had been intended and, if so, how they had been measured. The process and difficulties of conducting the review raise significant questions about policy formulation and evaluation. Is evidence-based policy possible where evaluations are not stored centrally? In short, a model policy development as 'enlightened' or incremental is hard to sustain where a lack of systematic storage of data means that researchers, policy makers and practitioners may struggle to produce clear answers to important policy questions.
Related content


Religion and urban regeneration: a place for faith?
Policy and Politics, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. :




The Politics of Cultural Policy in Urban Regeneration Strategies
Policy and Politics, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, 1993-01 ,pp. :


Between Whitehall and Town Hall: the realignment of urban regeneration policy in England
Policy and Politics, Vol. 22, Iss. 2, 1994-04 ,pp. :