

Publisher: Policy Press
ISSN: 0305-5736
Source: Policy and Politics, Vol.34, Iss.3, 2006-07, pp. : 557-573
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
There is a need to develop appropriate ways to analyse issues about complexity in the governance process and about accountability. The preoccupation with policy 'stages' need to be replaced with a more complex model of the way in which policy decisions are inter-related or 'nested'. It is argued that a 'multiple governance framework', influenced by Elinor Ostrom's 'institutional analysis and development' framework, offers a way to do this. The framework is illustrated using examples from English health and education policy, where there are opposed positions about professional autonomy and about local prerogatives, to show how this approach assists the analysis of issues like these.
Related content


Ideas into policy: governance and governmentality
Policy and Politics, Vol. 39, Iss. 4, 2011-10 ,pp. :


'Citizen governance': opportunities for inclusivity in policy and policy making?
Policy and Politics, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, 2007-07 ,pp. :


Policy and Politics, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, 1990-04 ,pp. :


Accountability and Local Budgetary Policy: unitary principles?
Policy and Politics, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, 1992-10 ,pp. :


European Policy and the Politics of Environmental Governance
Policy and Politics, Vol. 25, Iss. 2, 1997-04 ,pp. :