Significance of manipulating tumour hypoxia and radiation dose rate in terms of local tumour response and lung metastatic potential, referring to the response of quiescent cell populations

Author： MASUNAGA S   MATSUMOTO Y   KASHINO G   HIRAYAMA R   LIU Y   TANAKA H   SAKURAI Y   SUZUKI M   KINASHI Y   MARUHASHI A   ONO K  

Publisher： British Institute of Radiology

ISSN： 0007-1285

Source： British Journal of Radiology, Vol.83, Iss.993, 2010-09, pp. : 776-784

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Quantification of tumour response to radiotherapy

By Gong Q Y   Eldridge P R   Brodbelt A R   GarcÍa-Fiñana M   Zaman A   Jones B   Roberts N  

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 77, Iss. 917, 2004-05 ,pp. : 405-413

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The potential of PET to increase understanding of the biological basis of tumour and normal tissue response to radiotherapy

By WEST C M L   CHARNLEY N  

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 78, Iss. 1, 2005-11 ,pp. : 50-54

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to “Radiation dose measurement and optimization”

By Wall B F  

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 79, Iss. 940, 2006-04 ,pp. : 356-357

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On the possible increase in local tumour control probability for gliomas exhibiting low dose hyper-radiosensitivity using a pulsed schedule

By Tomé W A   Howard S P  

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 80, Iss. 949, 2007-01 ,pp. : 32-37

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of clinical, tumour-related and dosimetric factors in grade 0–1, grade 2 and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumours

By TAKEDA A   OHASHI T   KUNIEDA E   SANUKI N   ENOMOTO T   TAKEDA T   OKU Y   SHIGEMATSU N  

British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 85, Iss. 1013, 2012-05 ,pp. : 636-642

British Institute of Radiology

Access to resources Recommend Favorite