Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1469-901x|20|2|223-226
ISSN： 0034-4125
Source： Religious Studies, Vol.20, Iss.2, 1984-06, pp. : 223-226
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
I'm very grateful for the opportunity to reply to Paul Helm's perceptive remarks on my paper about divine impeccability, for, in dealing with his criticism, I can further clarify some points in my paper, and in discussing his alternative solution to the problems I raised, I can as yet deal with some important aspects I had ignored. Helm's paper is divided into three sections. The first two contain his criticism of my position, and the third his alternative solution. I will deal with these in turn.
Related content
Religious Studies, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 1984-06 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Religious Studies, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 1993-06 ,pp. :
God, compatibilism, and the authorship of sin
Religious Studies, Vol. 46, Iss. 1, 2010-03 ,pp. :
On Not Confusing Necessity with Compulsion: a Reply to Paul Helm
Religious Studies, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, 1995-03 ,pp. :
Jacob Boehme and Paul Tillich on Trinity and God: Similarities and Differences
Religious Studies, Vol. 31, Iss. 4, 1995-12 ,pp. :