Is the no-minimum claim true? Reply to Cullison

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-901x|47|1|125-127

ISSN： 0034-4125

Source： Religious Studies, Vol.47, Iss.1, 2011-02, pp. : 125-127

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The No-Minimum argument and satisficing: a reply to Chris Dragos

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 2013-11 ,pp. : 379-386

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The No-Minimum argument, satisficing, and no-best-world: a reply to Jeff Jordan

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 49, Iss. 3, 2012-11 ,pp. : 421-429

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A defence of the no-minimum response to the problem of evil

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 47, Iss. 1, 2010-07 ,pp. : 121-123

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A reply to Cunning on the nature of true and immutable natures

By Abbruzzese John Edward  

British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2007-02 ,pp. : 155-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà‐Vilà

By  

JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, 2015-07 ,pp. : 345-348

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite