

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1748-6858|76|3|415-437
ISSN: 0034-6705
Source: Review of Politics, Vol.76, Iss.3, 2014-07, pp. : 415-437
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Hannah Arendt argued that the American Revolution revealed for the first time that all regimes require a reference to an absolute, while the French Revolution revealed that not all absolutes are equal. The American Revolution took as its absolute the act of founding itself, upon which the authority of the constitution could be grounded. By contrast, the failure of the French Revolution to establish an authority stemmed from its reference to the transcendental absolute of the nation. Beginnings, for Arendt, are historically determining. How then are we to explain the present view of authority in Germany which takes as its absolute referent the Holocaust? And how does this inform our understanding of the relationship between absolutes and new foundations? We argue that the key to understanding the German case is found in the particular nature of postwar German memory politics and that authority is not statically related to positive foundations.
Related content


Review of Politics, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, 1942-10 ,pp. :


The Ruhr Authority and the German Problem
Review of Politics, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 1955-07 ,pp. :


Foundations of German Philosophy
Review of Politics, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 1949-01 ,pp. :


Two Studies of Postwar German Socialism
Review of Politics, Vol. 28, Iss. 4, 1966-10 ,pp. :


Oases in the Desert: Hannah Arendt on Democratic Politics
American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, Iss. 1, 1994-03 ,pp. :