The Right and the Good and W. D. Ross's Criticism of Consequentialism

E-ISSN： 1741-6183|10|3|261-280

ISSN： 0953-8208

Source： Utilitas, Vol.10, Iss.3, 1998-11, pp. : 261-280

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Objective consequentialism, right actions, and good people

By Moore Eric

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 133, Iss. 1, 2007-03 ,pp. : 83-94

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Good and the Right

Utilitas, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2007-09 ,pp. : 326-353

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Right Motive, Wrong Action: Direct Consequentialism and Evaluative Conflict

By Louise Jennie

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2006-02 ,pp. : 65-85

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Not Quite Non‐Consequentialism: The Implications of Pettit's ‘Three Mistakes about Doing Good (and Bad)’ for Metaphysics and Moral Philosophy

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. : 47-53

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

New does not mean true: concerning the right and the good

By Dum P.

The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 33, Iss. 2, 1999-06 ,pp. : 253-254

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite