Against Body Exceptionalism: A Reply to Eyal

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1741-6183|21|2|246-248

ISSN： 0953-8208

Source： Utilitas, Vol.21, Iss.2, 2009-06, pp. : 246-248

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Aristotle Against the Hippocratics on Sexual Generation: A Reply to Coles

By McGowan Tress Daryl  

Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 44, Iss. 3, 1999-06 ,pp. : 228-241

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

No Argument against the Continuity of Value: Reply to Dorsey

By  

Utilitas, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 494-496

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen

By  

BIOETHICS, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, 2018-03 ,pp. : 215-219

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply

By  

Philosophia Africana, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2002-03 ,pp. : 75-99

Depaul University - Department of Philosophy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

From the Body of Christ to Racial Homogeneity: Carl Schmitt's Mobilization of ‘Life’ against ‘the Spirit of Technicity’

By Braun Kathrin  

The European Legacy, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2012-02 ,pp. : 1-17

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite