Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1475-3065|23|2|191-200
ISSN: 0036-9306
Source: Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol.23, Iss.2, 1970-05, pp. : 191-200
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Much recent discussion of Luke and his theology has revolved around his interpretation of the eschatological outlook of early Christianity. That he has at this point entered upon a certain amount of redefinition seems clear from his handling of St. Mark's gospel. What is less clear, however, is that his interpretation represents the turning away from eschatology that is sometimes attributed to him and that, because of this, he merits the accusation of having compromised the outlook of the early proclamation. Wilckens defends Luke against such accusations on the grounds that they rest upon a one-sided conception of Paul's theology. It may also be suggested that they can be substantiated only by a failure to appreciate Luke's own outlook and by a determination to force him into the mould of ‘redemptive historya’.
Related content
The Parable of The Unjust Judge and The Eschatology of Luke-Acts
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 1963-09 ,pp. :
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 1984-01 ,pp. :
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 26, Iss. 1-4, 1984-01 ,pp. :
Luke-Acts and the Future of Israel
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 38, Iss. 1, 1996-01 ,pp. :
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 42, Iss. 4, 2000-10 ,pp. :