Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1475-3065|36|2|195-212
ISSN: 0036-9306
Source: Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol.36, Iss.2, 1983-05, pp. : 195-212
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Tillich claimed often and vehemently that the risk of faith in Jesus as the Christ ‘lies in quite a different dimension from the risk of accepting uncertain historical facts’.1 The ultimate concern expressed in and through Christology is free from the contingencies of history and the consequent possibility of falsification. Yet many critics have accused Tillich of making covert historical assumptions in an inconsistent manner, thus failing in practice to make good his claims. I wish to defend Tillich
Related content
The Hegelian Christology of Paul Tillich
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 1976-02 ,pp. :
The historical problem in Paul Tillich's christology
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, 1965-09 ,pp. :
Paul Tillich and Biblical Theology
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 29, Iss. 6, 1976-12 ,pp. :
The Symbolic Theology of Paul Tillich
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 1964-12 ,pp. :
The Fabric of Paul Tillich's Theology
Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, 1968-06 ,pp. :