

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1478-2294|18|1|10-17
ISSN: 1380-2038
Source: Archaeological Dialogues, Vol.18, Iss.1, 2011-04, pp. : 10-17
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The impulse to keep excavating, set against widespread failures to publish in a timely manner, has created a crisis of confidence for archaeology. This is especially so in Europe and North America, where contract archaeology has witnessed dramatic growth in recent decades, but it is not universally the case. Far from being the defining practice of the discipline, excavation is not the only technique for generating data relevant to archaeological problems and, ideally, should be deployed as one element in multi-stage, multi-scalar fieldwork strategies. In any given situation in different parts of the world, many locally specific factors affect the role and relative importance of excavation. Examples are given from the author's recent fieldwork in Greece, southern Armenia and the eastern Caribbean.
Related content


Antiquity, Vol. 63, Iss. 241, 1989-12 ,pp. :


Digging deeper in the archaeological psyche
Antiquity, Vol. 87, Iss. 336, 2013-06 ,pp. :


Antiquity, Vol. 84, Iss. 323, 2010-03 ,pp. :


Digging-Sticks and their use in Java
Antiquity, Vol. 31, Iss. 121, 1957-03 ,pp. :


Antiquity, Vol. 69, Iss. 262, 1995-03 ,pp. :