A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|5|2|196-196

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.5, Iss.2, 1982-06, pp. : 196-196

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 241-241

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 221-225

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Deception in the study of the peer-review process

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 210-211

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 225-226

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Peer-review research: Objections and obligations

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 246-255

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite