Does kinship terminology provide evidence for or against universal grammar?

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|33|5|381-382

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.33, Iss.5, 2010-12, pp. : 381-382

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Does Universal Grammar exist?

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 1989-06 ,pp. : 347-348

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Kinship terminology: polysemy or categorization?

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 33, Iss. 5, 2010-12 ,pp. : 386-387

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The algebraic logic of kinship terminology structures

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 33, Iss. 5, 2010-12 ,pp. : 399-401

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Pragmatic and positivistic analyses of kinship terminology

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 33, Iss. 5, 2010-12 ,pp. : 390-391

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Does normal processing provide evidence of specialised semantic subsystems?

By Shapiro Laura R.   Olson Andrew C.  

Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 2005-12 ,pp. : 697-724

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite