An ethical and prudential argument for prioritizing the reduction of parasite-stress in the allocation of health care resources

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|35|2|90-91

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.35, Iss.2, 2012-01, pp. : 90-91

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Analyses do not support the parasite-stress theory of human sociality

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. : 83-85

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rethinking innovative designs to further test parasite-stress theory

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. : 93-94

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The parasite-stress theory may be a general theory of culture and sociality

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. : 99-119

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. : 86-87

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Parasite-stress, cultures of honor, and the emergence of gender bias in purity norms

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. : 95-96

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite