

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 2044-0456|17|2|331-394
ISSN: 1357-3217
Source: British Actuarial Journal, Vol.17, Iss.2, 2012-04, pp. : 331-394
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper explores the application of ERM-style techniques to pension funds. It uses the term ‘entity-wide risk management’ rather than ‘enterprise risk management’, even though both have the same acronym (‘ERM’), because many pension funds do not view themselves as business ‘enterprises’ as such. Some of the techniques that business enterprises have for managing risk (e.g. raising new capital from shareholders or branching into new business areas if existing ones have unattractive risk-reward characteristics) may not be open to many pension funds. The paper argues that the holistic approach to risk management (and governance) that is a hallmark of ERM is as appropriate to pension funds as it is to any other type of entity. This is the case whether the fund is defined benefit or defined contribution in nature, or a hybrid. It is also the case whether the ‘entity’ is deemed to be the fund itself, the sponsor or the two combined. Indeed, there are aspects of pension arrangements, such as the relationship between the fund and its sponsor, that lend added impetus to the use of ERM-style techniques in practical pension fund management.
Related content






Defining and Measuring Investment Risk in Defined Benefit Pension Funds
Annals of Actuarial Science, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 2007-03 ,pp. :


Differentiating Indexation in Dutch Pension Funds
By Beetsma Roel
De Economist, Vol. 159, Iss. 3, 2011-09 ,pp. :


The influence of pension funds on corporate governance
Applied Economics, Vol. 46, Iss. 19, 2014-07 ,pp. :