A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|8|4|744-745

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.8, Iss.4, 1985-12, pp. : 744-745

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 231-232

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 225-226

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 196-196

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 241-241

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 1982-06 ,pp. : 238-238

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite