Support for the hypothesis that the actions of dopamine are “not merely motor.”

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|5|1|54-55

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.5, Iss.1, 1982-03, pp. : 54-55

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

The dopamine anhedonia hypothesis: A pharmacological phrenology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1982-03 ,pp. : 63-64

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Is sensory-motor partitioning a good hypothesis?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, 1989-12 ,pp. : 669-670

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The neuropsychology of schizophrenia: Beyond the dopamine hypothesis to behavioural function

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 1993-03 ,pp. : 203-205

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Jensen's support for Spearman's hypothesis is support for a circular argument

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 1985-07 ,pp. : 246-246

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Influence of Approach and Avoidance Motor Actions on Creative Cognition

By Friedman R.S. Förster J.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 38, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. : 41-55

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite