

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 2153-3326|5|2|329-352
ISSN: 1052-150x
Source: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol.5, Iss.2, 1995-04, pp. : 329-352
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Western business philosophy is rooted in the concepts of free enterprise, free markets, free choice. Yet freedom has its limits. Nature itself imposes constraints. In the state of nature each business must try to accomplish everything autonomously and ward off the attacks of rivals. These activities cost the business a great deal of freedom. The social contract emerges from such anarchy to increase the freedom available to all members of society. It does so by setting limits on individual freedom which actually increase the overall amount of freedom available within the system. The Social Equation presents a relational model of this contract to show how overall freedom is increased in a state of society. In so doing, the obligations which society places on businesses to produce beneficial goods and services is developed. Next, the complex relationship between socially enforced constraints and social moral constraints is examined, showing that social moral constraints increase freedom more than do enforced constraints. This work concludes with proposed uses of the Social Equation as a heuristic for business ethics.
Related content




By Lindert P.H.
Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 1996-01 ,pp. :


The microelectronics revolution-limits to its growth?
By Spencer G.
Futures, Vol. 27, Iss. 7, 1995-09 ,pp. :


Postwar Normalisation and its Limits in the USSR: the Case of Trade
Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 2001-05 ,pp. :