Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1474-001x|15|3|211-239
ISSN： 0007-0874
Source： British Journal for the History of Science, Vol.15, Iss.3, 1982-11, pp. : 211-239
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In spite of vigorous opposition by a number of historians it has now become a commonplace that the rapid development of the ‘new philosophy’ sprang from the ideology of Puritanism. What began its career as the ‘Merton thesis’ has now been refined, developed, and so often repeated that it seems to be almost unassailable. However, the two foremost historians in the entrenchment of this new orthodoxy are willing, in principle, to concede that ‘in reality things were very mixed up’, and that non-Puritan natural philosophers at the time were operating ‘in a precisely similar manner’ to their Puritan contemporaries. Indeed, it would be impossible not to concede this in the face of the many critiques launched against the Merton thesis.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Essay Review: The Natural Philosophy of Galileo
British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 1972-06 ,pp. :
County Government in Yorkshire During the Interregnum
Northern History, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 1976-01 ,pp. :