Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1474-001x|7|1|1-41
ISSN: 0007-0874
Source: British Journal for the History of Science, Vol.7, Iss.1, 1974-03, pp. : 1-41
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The institutionalization of natural knowledge in the form of a scientific society may be interpreted in several ways. If we wish to view science as something apart, unchanging in its intellectual nature, we may regard the scientific enterprise as presenting to the sustaining social system a number of absolute and necessary organizational demands: for example, scientific activity requires acceptance as an important social activity valued for its own sake, that is, it requires autonomy; it is separate from other forms of enquiry and requires distinct institutional modes; it is public knowledge and requires a public, universalistic forum; it is productive of constant change and requires of the sustaining social system a flexibility in adapting to change. Support for such an interpretation may be found in the rise of modern science in seventeenth-century England, France, and Italy and in the accompanying rise of specifically scientific societies. Thus, the founding of the Royal Society of London may be interpreted as the organizational embodiment of immanent demands arising from scientific activity—the cashing of a blank cheque payable to science written on society's current account.
Related content
Politics, Patronage and Newtonianism: the Cambridge Example
The Historical Journal, Vol. 27, Iss. 1, 1984-03 ,pp. :
The Philosophical Society of Edinburgh 1748–1768
British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 1981-07 ,pp. :
The Philosophical Society of Edinburgh 1768–1783
British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, 1985-11 ,pp. :