Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1475-2662|114|8|1304-1312

ISSN： 0007-1145

Source： British Journal of Nutrition, Vol.114, Iss.8, 2015-08, pp. : 1304-1312

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods

By  

Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, 2016-10 ,pp. : 598-607

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reporting accuracy of population dietary sodium intake using duplicate 24 h dietary recalls and a salt questionnaire

By  

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 113, Iss. 3, 2015-02 ,pp. : 488-497

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Iodine intake and iodine deficiency in vegans as assessed by the duplicate-portion technique and urinary iodine excretion

By  

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 80, Iss. 6, 1998-12 ,pp. : 529-535

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Energy intake by multiple pass 24 h recall and total energy expenditure: a comparison in a representative sample of 3–4-year-olds

By  

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 86, Iss. 5, 2001-11 ,pp. : 601-605

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Validation of a FFQ to estimate the intake of PUFA using plasma phospholipid fatty acids and weighed foods records

By  

British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 97, Iss. 3, 2007-03 ,pp. : 561-568

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite