Tort—Defamation—Statment defamatory by reason of special facts—Sufficient to prove that persons who know these facts and to whom they are published might reasonably think them defamatory, even though they did not believe the imputation

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|7|3|413-413

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.7, Iss.3, 1941-11, pp. : 413-413

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Tort — Defamation — Libel — Caricature Used as Advertisement for Goods — Whether Reasonably Capable of Bearing Defamatory Meaning

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 1932-11 ,pp. : 386-387

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Defamation—Innuendo—Capable of bearing a Defamatory Meaning—Text to be Applied

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 1927-11 ,pp. : 89-90

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Defamation—Talking Film held to be Libel not Slander—Allegation that a Woman has been Ravished held to be Defamatory—Damages

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, 1929-11 ,pp. : 405-406

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Defamation—Talking Film held to be Libel not Slander—Allegation that a Woman has been Ravished held to be Defamatory—Damages

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 1935-11 ,pp. : 405-406

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Defamation—Prima Facie Innocent Statement—Publisher Ignorant of Extraneous Facts

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 1930-03 ,pp. : 75-75

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite