Related content

Contracts of employment: An employer is bound to take all reasonable steps, including pursuing litigation against insurers, to secure benefits under a PHI policy for an employee with a contractual entitlement to those benefits, the High Court holds. (p.9)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 706, Iss. 1, 2003-02 ,pp. : 9-11

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In a third case, the Court of Appeal holds that the implied contractual term that an employer will not, save for good cause, terminate employment so as to remove an employee's health insurance benefits, does not prevent a dismissal where the employee had shown to be not bound by the contract. (p.11)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 702, Iss. 1, 2002-12 ,pp. : 11-13

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

In another case, the Court of Appeal holds that an employee remained entitled to benefits under a PHI scheme despite not fulfilling a requirement that he should be unable to "follow any occupation". (p.11)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 706, Iss. 1, 2003-02 ,pp. : 11-12

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Contracts of employment: The High Court holds that, where dismissal for a reason other than redundancy will defeat an employee's entitlement to enhanced redundancy benefits, lawful dismissal cannot be for any other reason but redundancy, except for good cause. (p.8)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 703, Iss. 1, 2002-12 ,pp. : 8-9

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

When is an Employee Not an Employee—Inducing Breach of Contract

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, 1967-04 ,pp. : 27-30

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite