Derivation rules as anti-axioms in modal logic

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN: 1943-5886|58|3|1003-1034

ISSN: 0022-4812

Source: The Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol.58, Iss.3, 1993-09, pp. : 1003-1034

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

We discuss a ‘negative’ way of defining frame classes in (multi)modal logic, and address the question of whether these classes can be axiomatized by derivation rules, the ‘non-ξ rules’, styled after Gabbay's Irreflexivity Rule. The main result of this paper is a metatheorem on completeness, of the following kind: If is a derivation system having a set of axioms that are special Sahlqvist formulas and + is the extension of with a set of non-ξ rules, then + is strongly sound and complete with respect to the class of frames determined by the axioms and the rules.