Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1537-5943|4|3|365-373
ISSN： 0003-0554
Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.4, Iss.3, 1910-08, pp. : 365-373
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
When the report of Chinese opposition against foreign loans reaches the western world, a certain class of people at once call such opposition the outcome of the historical anti-foreign feeling, oriental exclusiveness, self-conceit, and Boxerism. They assume that the Chinese have no grievance at all, and that these orientals “kick” simply because they are self-conceited heathens who do not know what is good for them. The more representative class, however, do not unreservedly subscribe to this opinion. They interpret the opposition as a manifestation of “Chinese nationalization.” Thus the New York
Related content
Revolution, modernization and Chinese foreign policy
Review of International Studies, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, 1986-07 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
