

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1533-6247|20|4|333-358
ISSN: 0003-1615
Source: The Americas, Vol.20, Iss.4, 1964-04, pp. : 333-358
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
There existed in the United States in the late nineteenth century a strong conviction that the Nicaragua route utilizing the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua was the only satisfactory route for an interoceanic canal across the American Isthmus. Not only had Lesseps earlier favored this route for a lock canal, but the activity of the French interests in Panama, and then their failure there, had reinforced in the minds of many United States citizens their old desire for a canal across Nicaragua. But the United States interest in a Nicaragua canal had never been dependent upon what happened in Panama; in the early 1880’s, as the French began work in Panama, and later as well, sentiment in the United States favored a Nicaragua canal even though the French should ultimately succeed, for influential persons in the United States—President Hayes and General Grant among them—feared foreign monopoly of a single interoceanic waterway at a time when they had come to regard our free access to such a transit as vital to the national interest.
Related content




The Issue of Religious Liberty in the United States Commercial Treaty with Colombia, 1824
The Americas, Vol. 26, Iss. 3, 1970-01 ,pp. :


A Bird’s-Eye View of Brazilian-Portuguese Studies in the United States
The Americas, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 1954-04 ,pp. :


An Ohio Argonaut’s Observations on the Church in Nicaragua
The Americas, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 1952-07 ,pp. :