Comment: Multiple Advocacy: Some “Limits and Costs”

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1537-5943|66|3|786-790

ISSN： 0003-0554

Source： American Political Science Review, Vol.66, Iss.3, 1972-09, pp. : 786-790

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Comment on Rae's “The Limits of Consensual Decision”

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 69, Iss. 4, 1975-12 ,pp. : 1295-1297

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy*

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 66, Iss. 3, 1972-09 ,pp. : 751-785

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems

By  

British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 1, Iss. 4, 1971-10 ,pp. : 467-477

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment: Political Methodologies in Disarray: Some Alternative Interpretations of the 1972 Election

By  

American Political Science Review, Vol. 70, Iss. 3, 1976-09 ,pp. : 814-831

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Some Social and Political Correlates of County Borough Expenditures: A Comment

By  

British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 1972-01 ,pp. : 131-132

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite