Explaining the Tension between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts' (Seeming) Rejection of Same

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1750-0117|5|3|329-342

ISSN： 1742-3600

Source： Episteme, Vol.5, Iss.3, 2008-10, pp. : 329-342

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemology” in Medicine and Law: Parallels between Legal Reforms to the Admissibility of Expert Evidence and Evidence-Based Medicine

By Mercer David  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2008-10 ,pp. : 405-423

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The appointment of William O. Douglas to the Supreme Court

By  

JOURNAL OF SUPREME COURT HISTORY, Vol. 40, Iss. 1, 2015-03 ,pp. : 80-99

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Dennett on seeming

By Carman Taylor  

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 6, Iss. 1-2, 2007-03 ,pp. : 99-106

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Prima facie and Seeming Duties

By Morreau M.  

Studia Logica, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 1996-07 ,pp. : 47-71

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Seeing-in and seeming to see

By Hopkins Robert  

Analysis, Vol. 72, Iss. 4, 2012-10 ,pp. : 650-659

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite