

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-5103|20|3|607-645
ISSN: 0018-246x
Source: The Historical Journal, Vol.20, Iss.3, 1977-09, pp. : 607-645
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Historians have generally accepted the verdict that the 1902 Education Act was ‘among the two or three greatest constructive measures of the twentieth century’. Most have accepted likewise the interpretation laid down by the biographer of the Act's alleged author, Sir Robert Morant, that an educational crisis forced the Unionist government to begin thinking seriously about education. Their ineptitude, shown in attempts at legislation in 1900 and 1901, forced them to turn to the one man who could help, namely Morant, secretary to the vice president of the Board of Education, Sir John Gorst, and then to the president, the duke of Devonshire. Thus ‘Balfour, Hicks-Beach and Chamberlain had all to bow the knee to his [Morant's] ruthless tenacity in argument’, whilst Morant ‘
Related content


The Unionist Party and Social Policy 1906–1914
The Historical Journal, Vol. 24, Iss. 4, 1981-12 ,pp. :




The Confederacy and the Purge of the Unionist Free Traders, 1906–1910
The Historical Journal, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, 1975-06 ,pp. :


1707, 2007, AND THE UNIONIST TURN IN SCOTTISH HISTORY
The Historical Journal, Vol. 53, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. :


Unionist Politics and Protestant Society in Edwardian Ireland
The Historical Journal, Vol. 33, Iss. 4, 1990-12 ,pp. :