

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1474-0060|14|1|97-125
ISSN: 1468-1099
Source: Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol.14, Iss.1, 2013-02, pp. : 97-125
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
When a central government deals with local demands, it may strengthen political accountability of the local governments by political decentralization or offer benefits through economic assistance. An authoritarian regime uses economic assistance policy because political decentralization may contradict regime survival. Although economic benefits can be used to buy political support, the distribution of these benefits is seldom equal. We argue that the unequal distribution is more salient in regions where ethnic minorities reside because the unusual demographic composition of those areas make it difficult for the national government to evaluate the performance of the local government who is responsible for the distribution of the economic benefits. As a result, economic assistance may backfire in ethnic regions and intensify their existing conflicts. We develop a simple formal model to illustrate our arguments and explore the cases of Xinjiang and Hong Kong for empirical analysis.
Related content






Asean-China Economic Relations
By Ba Alice D.
Pacific Affairs, Vol. 81, Iss. 4, 2008-01 ,pp. :
Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British Columbia


Capital Markets and Central–Local Politics in Britain
British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 1986-07 ,pp. :


Advancing Singapore-China Economic Relations
Pacific Affairs, Vol. 88, Iss. 4, 2015-12 ,pp. :
Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British Columbia