Don't be fooled—A no‐observed‐effect concentration is no substitute for a poor concentration–response experiment

E-ISSN： 1552-8618|35|9|2141-2148

ISSN： 0730-7268

Source： ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol.35, Iss.9, 2016-09, pp. : 2141-2148

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

High‐throughput concentration–response analysis for omics datasets

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 2167-2180

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The effect of seawater CO2 concentration on growth of a natural phytoplankton assemblage in a controlled mesocosm experiment

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, Vol. 51, Iss. 4, 2006-07 ,pp. : 1629-1636

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Increasing carbon dioxide concentration in the upper atmosphere observed by SABER

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, Vol. 42, Iss. 17, 2015-09 ,pp. : 7194-7199

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The hysteresis response of soil CO2 concentration and soil respiration to soil temperature

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, Vol. 2169-8953, Iss. 8, 2015-08 ,pp. : 1605-1618

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The potential for detecting ‘life as we don't know it’ by fractal complexity analysis

International Journal of Astrobiology, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, 2013-10 ,pp. : 314-320

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite