

Author: Bethell Emily J. Holmes Amanda MacLarnon Ann Semple Stuart
Publisher: MDPI
E-ISSN: 2076-328x|6|1|2-2
ISSN: 2076-328x
Source: Behavioral Sciences, Vol.6, Iss.1, 2016-01, pp. : 2-2
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The cognitive bias model of animal welfare assessment is informed by studies with humans demonstrating that the interaction between emotion and cognition can be detected using laboratory tasks. A limitation of cognitive bias tasks is the amount of training required by animals prior to testing. A potential solution is to use biologically relevant stimuli that trigger innate emotional responses. Here; we develop a new method to assess emotion in rhesus macaques; informed by paradigms used with humans: emotional Stroop; visual cueing and; in particular; response slowing. In humans; performance on a simple cognitive task can become impaired when emotional distractor content is displayed. Importantly; responses become slower in anxious individuals in the presence of mild threat; a pattern not seen in non-anxious individuals; who are able to effectively process and disengage from the distractor. Here; we present a proof-of-concept study; demonstrating that rhesus macaques show slowing of responses in a simple touch-screen task when emotional content is introduced; but only when they had recently experienced a presumably stressful veterinary inspection. Our results indicate the presence of a subtle “cognitive freeze” response; the measurement of which may provide a means of identifying negative shifts in emotion in animals.
Related content




Applying Evolutionary Thinking to the Study of Emotion
By Weisfeld Glenn E. Goetz Stefan M. M.
Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, 2013-07 ,pp. :


Functional Perspectives on Emotion, Behavior, and Cognition
By Lench Heather C. Darbor Kathleen E. Berg Logan A.
Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 2013-10 ,pp. :




By Raver C. Cybele Roy Amanda L. Pressler Emily Ursache Alexandra M. Charles McCoy Dana
Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2016-12 ,pp. :