The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1365-2559|64|3|405-411

ISSN： 0309-0167

Source： HISTOPATHOLOGY, Vol.64, Iss.3, 2014-02, pp. : 405-411

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Handling and reporting of orchidectomy specimens with testicular cancer: areas of consensus and variation among 25 experts and 225 European pathologists

By  

HISTOPATHOLOGY, Vol. 67, Iss. 3, 2015-09 ,pp. : 313-324

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Incidence and Variables Predicting Gleason Score Up-Grading between Trans-Rectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 84, Iss. 2, 2010-03 ,pp. : 180-184

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Value of Prognostic Grouping of Prostatic Carcinomas for Urologists and Pathologists

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 95, Iss. 4, 2015-0 ,pp. : 436-444

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Gleason Scores from Sextant Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 67, Iss. 1, 2001-07 ,pp. : 14-18

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Inherent Grading Characteristics of Individual Pathologists Contribute to Clinically and Prognostically Relevant Interobserver Discordance Concerning Broders' Grading of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinomas

By  

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 90, Iss. 2, 2012-10 ,pp. : 207-213

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite