

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1097-0266|36|12|1877-1894
ISSN: 0143-2095
Source: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, Vol.36, Iss.12, 2015-12, pp. : 1877-1894
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In this study, we develop and test a theory of CEO relative pay standing. Specifically, we propose that CEOs with negative relative pay standing status (underpaid relative to comparison CEOs) will engage in acquisition activity, as a self‐interested means of attempting to realign their pay with that of their peers. We further propose that, when CEOs with negative relative pay standing acquire, they will tend to finance those acquisitions more heavily with stock than cash, to mitigate the risk associated with those deals. Finally, we argue that acquisition activity will partially mediate the influence of CEO negative relative pay standing on subsequent CEO compensation increases; however, that pay growth will come primarily in the form of long‐term incentive pay. Our results support our predictions. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related content


CEO Remuneration: Tangled Top Pay?
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, Vol. 38, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. :


CEO Turnover and Relative Performance Evaluation
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE, Vol. 70, Iss. 5, 2015-10 ,pp. :


CEO Pay, Shareholder Returns, and Accounting Profits
International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2000-11 ,pp. :


Earnings distribution, corporate governance and CEO pay
International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. :