Impact of geolocations of validation data on the evaluation of surface incident shortwave radiation from Earth System Models

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 2169-8996|120|14|6825-6844

ISSN： 2169-897x

Source： JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, Vol.120, Iss.14, 2015-07, pp. : 6825-6844

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

AbstractGround‐based observations of surface incident solar radiation (Rs) have been used to evaluate simulations of global climate models. Existing studies have shown that biases in simulated clouds have a significant spatial pattern, which may be transferred to the simulated Rs. Therefore, the evaluation results of Rs simulations may depend on the locations of the ground‐based observations. In this study, Rs simulations of 48 models participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) were first evaluated with ground‐based observations from different networks (446 stations in total) from 2000 to 2005. The global mean biases of the CMIP5 Rs simulations were found to vary from 4.8 to 11.9 W m−2 when Rs observations from different networks were used as reference data. To reduce the location impact on the evaluation results, CMIP5 simulated Rs was then evaluated with the latest satellite Rs retrieval at 1° × 1° spatial resolution by the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF). It was found that the CMIP5 simulated multimodel mean Rs has a small bias of 2.6 W m−2 compared with CERES EBAF over the globe, 4.7 W m−2 and 1.7 W m−2 over land and oceans, respectively. CERES EBAF Rs was found to have a positive bias of 1.3 W m−2 compared with ground‐based observations. After removing this bias of CERES EBAF Rs, global mean Rs was estimated to be 185 W m−2.