

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1939-9170|55|3|605-613
ISSN: 0012-9658
Source: Ecology, Vol.55, Iss.3, 1974-05, pp. : 605-613
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Twelve 42—liter plankton cages were used in an alpine Colorado pond to test a size—efficiency hypothesis: to determine why small herbivorous zooplankton species tend not to coexist with large species. The size—efficiency hypothesis, that large species exclude the smaller ones through competition for food, was not substantiated. An alternate hypothesis extends the understanding of the importance of size—selective predators to include invertebrates selecting small prey. A predaceous copepod Diaptomus shoshone excluded the small Daphnia minnehaha from an association with the large D. middendorffiana within 1 mo. By implication, the predacious copepod is responsible for the absence of the small species in ponds occupied by the large Daphnia species.
Related content


Rotifer Threshold Food Concentrations and the Size‐Efficiency Hypothesis
Ecology, Vol. 68, Iss. 1, 1987-02 ,pp. :


Effects of Size‐Selective Predation and Food Competition on High Altitude Zooplankton Communities
Ecology, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 1972-05 ,pp. :


Anuran Size at Metamorphosis: Experimental Test of a Model Based on Intraspecific Competition
Ecology, Vol. 65, Iss. 4, 1984-08 ,pp. :


An Experimental Test of a Guild: Salamander Competition
Ecology, Vol. 62, Iss. 1, 1981-02 ,pp. :