Protecting Research Confidentiality via the Wigmore Criteria: Some Implications of Parent and Bruckert v The Queen and Luka Rocco Magnotta

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1911-0227|31|3|473-493

ISSN： 0829-3201

Source： Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, Vol.31, Iss.3, 2016-11, pp. : 473-493

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Dunn v. The Queen Revisited

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 34, Iss. 2, 1975-11 ,pp. : 253-281

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Protecting Dignitary Interests of Biobank Research Participants: Lessons from Havasupai Tribe v Arizona Board of Regents

By Van Assche Kristof   Gutwirth Serge   Sterckx Sigrid  

Law, Innovation and Technology, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2013-07 ,pp. : 54-84

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Thomas More and Charles V Part II / III: A good servant of the Queen

By Olivares Merino Eugenio M.  

Moreana, Vol. 50(Number193-194), Iss. 3-4, 2013-12 ,pp. : 187-228

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Confidentiality and Secrecy

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 47, Iss. 3, 1988-11 ,pp. : 329-332

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

When is a Parent not a Parent? CS v KS and JS and the Question of Genetic Parentage or Social Parenting

By  

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 2015-05 ,pp. : 263-268

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite