WHAT ECONOMICS CAN AND CANNOT SAY ABOUT EGALITARIAN REDISTRIBUTION

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1471-6437|34|1|56-78

ISSN： 0265-0525

Source： Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol.34, Iss.1, 2017-06, pp. : 56-78

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

What Can One Reasonably Say About Nonexistence? a Tibetan Work on the Problem of Āśrayāsiddha

By Tillemans T.J.F.   Lopez Jr. D.S.  

Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 1998-04 ,pp. : 99-129

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What Philosophy can and cannot do for Education

By Smeyers Paul  

Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 25, Iss. 1-2, 2006-03 ,pp. : 1-18

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Diminishing Marginal Utility and Egalitarian Redistribution

By Schmidtz D.  

The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 34, Iss. 2-3, 2000-09 ,pp. : 263-272

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What Even Consequentialists Should Say About the Virtues

By  

Utilitas, Vol. 19, Iss. 4, 2007-12 ,pp. : 466-486

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Beyond legitimacy. Can proceduralism say anything relevant about justice?

By Ceva Emanuela  

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2012-03 ,pp. : 183-200

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite