

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1471-6437|34|1|164-185
ISSN: 0265-0525
Source: Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol.34, Iss.1, 2017-06, pp. : 164-185
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Advocates of social equality need to develop an account of the society they favor. I have argued elsewhere that social equality should be conceived negatively: in terms of opposition to asymmetric and alienating relations such as hierarchy, domination and social exclusion, rather than in terms of a positive model of equality. This essay looks in detail at social exclusion, or rather “differential social inclusion,” and especially at the mechanisms that create exclusion and bind excluded groups together, and the consequent effects these mechanisms have on the reinforcement of inequality of opportunity and failure of social solidarity. Possible policies, such as improved social mobility, assertive self-affirmation, validation of subcultures, integration, and the creation of a large public sector are considered as possible responses to differential social inclusion in order to move closer to the idea of a society of equals.
Related content








By Bluck R.S.
Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 1957-01 ,pp. :


Inclusion versus Experimentation
By Durodié Bill
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. :