Why Islamic ‘Traditionalists’ and ‘Rationalists’ both ought to accept Rational Objectivism

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-901x|53|4|467-477

ISSN： 0034-4125

Source： Religious Studies, Vol.53, Iss.4, 2016-10, pp. : 467-477

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion

By  

Utilitas, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2002-11 ,pp. : 339-359

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What ought probably means, and why you can’t detach it

By Finlay Stephen  

Synthese, Vol. 177, Iss. 1, 2010-11 ,pp. : 67-89

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Peirce-Suit of Truth – Why Inference to the Best Explanation and Abduction Ought Not to be Confused

By Minnameier Gerhard  

Erkenntnis, Vol. 60, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. : 75-105

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Can Virtuous Actions be Both Habitual and Rational?

By Pollard Bill  

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 6, Iss. 4, 2003-12 ,pp. : 411-425

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Moral Rights and the Limits of the Ought‐Implies‐Can Principle: Why Impeccable Precautions are No Excuse

By Kramer Matthew  

Inquiry, Vol. 48, Iss. 4, 2005-08 ,pp. : 307-355

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite