Response to letter to the editor PD‐17‐0390, a comment on “Comparing methods for fetal fraction determination and quality control of NIPT samples”

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1097-0223|37|12|1266-1267

ISSN： 0197-3851

Source： PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Vol.37, Iss.12, 2017-12, pp. : 1266-1267

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

A comment on “Comparing methods for fetal fraction determination and quality control of NIPT samples”

By  

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Vol. 37, Iss. 12, 2017-12 ,pp. : 1265-1265

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Letter to the Editor: A Comment on the First Report

By Letourneau Elizabeth J.  

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. : 77-81

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Letter to the Editor by Bjordal

By Kromer Thilo O   Tautenhahn Ulrike G.   de Bie Rob A.   Staal J. Bart   Bastiaenen Caroline H. G.  

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 42, Iss. 7, 2010-07 ,pp. : 701-702

Medical Journals Limited

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Response to Letter to the Editor

By Skjeie Holgeir   Skonnord Trygve   Fetveit Arne   Brekke Mette  

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2014-03 ,pp. : 52-52

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Letter to the Editor: Author Response

By Rautenberg Tamlyn  

Journal of Medical Economics, Vol. 17, Iss. 6, 2014-06 ,pp. : 443-443

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite