Biological Aspects as a Rule for Single Implant Placement. The 3A‐2B Rule: A Clinical Report

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1532-849x|22|7|575-580

ISSN： 1059-941X

Source： JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, Vol.22, Iss.7, 2013-10, pp. : 575-580

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Esthetic outcome of single implant crowns following type 1 and type 3 implant placement: a systematic review

By  

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Vol. 26, Iss. 7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 768-774

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

'Work to rule' on 3 December

By  

Community Practitioner, Vol. 81, Iss. 12, 2008-12 ,pp. : 4-7

Community Practitioner

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical criteria to rule out cervical spine injury

By  

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 2001-01 ,pp. : 31-33

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Unconventional Implant Placement Part III: Implant Placement Encroaching upon Residual Roots – A Report of Six Cases

By  

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Vol. 17, Iss. S2, 2015-10 ,pp. : e396-e405

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Technical and biological complications of single‐molar implant restorations

By  

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Vol. 26, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 1024-1030

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite