Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Type II Glass Ionomer Cement, Type IX Glass Ionomer Cement, and AMALGOMER™ Ceramic Reinforcement by Modified “Direct Contact Test”: An in vitro Study

Publisher： Jaypee Infomedia

E-ISSN： 0975-1904|9|2|114-117

ISSN： 0974-7052

Source： International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Vol.9, Iss.2, 2016-04, pp. : 114-117

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study

By  

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. : 6-10

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Modified Glass Ionomer Cement with “Remove on Demand” Properties: An In Vitro Study

By Bishti Shaza   Tuna Taskin   Agrawal Garima   Pich Andrij   Wolfart Stefan  

Dentistry Journal, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2017-01 ,pp. : 9-9

MDPI

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study

By  

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 2013-01 ,pp. : 7-11

Jaypee Infomedia

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine- Containing Glass Ionomer Cement in vivo: A Pilot Study

By  

Caries Research, Vol. 41, Iss. 2, 2007-02 ,pp. : 102-107

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Solubility of a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement

By Quackenbush Brett M.   Donly Kevin J.   Croll Theodore P.  

Journal of Dentistry for Children, Vol. 65, Iss. 5, 1998-09 ,pp. : 310-312

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Access to resources Recommend Favorite