Author： Brown Jessica A.
Publisher： Oxford University Press
ISSN： 0003-2638
Source： Analysis, Vol.73, Iss.2, 2013-04, pp. : 220-227
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Stanley and Williamson have defended the intellectualist thesis that knowing-how is a subspecies of knowing-that by appeal to the syntax and semantics of ascriptions of knowing-how. Critics have objected that this way of defending intellectualism places undue weight on linguistic considerations and fails to give sufficient attention to empirical considerations from the scientific study of the mind. In this article, I examine and reject Stanleys recent attempt to answer the critics.
Related content
How Not to Do the Cognitive Science of Religion Today
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
The Cognitive Science of Religion
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2004-01 ,pp. :
TOWARDS A COGNITIVE SCIENCE OF RELIGION
Numen, Vol. 47, Iss. 3, 2000-07 ,pp. :