Getting to the Point: Attempting to Improve Juror Comprehension of Capital Penalty Phase Instructions

Author： Smith Amy  

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 0147-7307

Source： Law and Human Behavior, Vol.35, Iss.5, 2011-10, pp. : 339-350

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Jurors' comprehension of sentencing instructions: A test of the death penalty process in Tennessee*

By Blankenship Michael   Luginbuhl James   Cullen Francis   Redick William  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 1997-06 ,pp. : 325-351

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators

By Patry Marc W.  

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 204-244

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Attorney–Client Relationship in Capital Cases and Its Impact on Juror Receptivity to Mitigation Evidence

By Brewer Thomas  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 22, Iss. 3, 2005-09 ,pp. : 340-363

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bushell's Case and the Juror's Soul

By Crosby Kevin  

The Journal of Legal History, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, 2012-12 ,pp. : 251-290

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Criminal Law—Attempting the Impossible

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 1974-04 ,pp. : 31-36

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite